High CourtsSingle Bench(2002) 08 MAD CK 0048

K. Rethinasamy vs The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance/South, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Thiruchengode, Namakkal

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 August 2002

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.D. Dinakaran, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 32915 of 2002 and WPMP No. 48913 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 210 words

P.D. Dinakaran, J.—Aggrieved by the interim suspension pending enquiry made in proceedings dated 19.7.2002 of the respondent, the

petitioner seeks for the issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of suspension made in Memo No. AEE/O &

M/SOUTH/T''Gode/F.2/D.06/2002 on the file of the respondent dated 19.7.2002.

2.

It is not proper for this court to interfere with the order of suspension made pending disciplinary action against the petitioner.

3.But, taking into consideration the contentions of Mr. S. Doraisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no basis for initiating impugned

disciplinary action ,much less to pass the impugned order of suspension, I am obliged to issue the following directions to the respondent:

(i) to continue to pay the subsistence allowance during the period of interim suspension pending the disciplinary proceedings;

(ii) to expedite the enquiry, to frame charges, to furnish materials that are relied on by the respondent for framing the charges, to appoint enquiry

officer and to complete the enquiry and pass appropriate orders within 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order after giving fair and

reasonable opportunity to the petitioner;

4.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, WP.Mp.No.48913 of 2002 is closed.