Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3188

Junoon Capital Services Private Limited vs ITO Ward 13(4)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 22 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member · Amitabh Shukla, Accountant Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA 8542/DEL/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 205 words

PER AMITABH SHUKLA, AM

This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-31, New Delhi, dated 01.07.2025 arising out of assessment order dated 09.03.2016 passed under section u/s 143(3) of the Act for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The word ‘Act’ herein this order would mean Income Tax Act, 1961.

2.

At the outset, we have noted that, the Registry has pointed out that this appeal is defective because there is delay of 79 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and Original Form 36 has also not been filed. At the time of hearing, it was noticed by the Bench that the assessee has not filed any condonation petition/application. However, arguments were heard with direction to file condonation application. Same has not been filed thereafter inspite of request being sent through Bench Clerk. Material available on records indicate that the assessee has failed to substantiate its case and has not removed the defect inspite of having given opportunity. It is trite law that law aids only a vigilant litigant and not otherwise. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as defective.

3.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as defective.