High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 12 MP CK 0133

Jujhar Singh vs Ramadhar Yadav And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 20 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Agarwal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 6155 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 205 words

Vivek Agarwal, J

1.

This appeal is filed by the appellant under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved of order dated 24.11.2022, passed by learned Fourth Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sagar (M.P.), whereby, learned Tribunal has rejected the Claim Petition, saying that sub-section (3) of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act provides for limitation of four months to file a Claim Petition.

2.

It is submitted that Kerala at Ernakulam in OP (MAC) No.51 of 2022, vide order dated 01.06.2022, has dealt with this issue and has held that after introduction of the amendment w.e.f. 01.04.2022, the amendment will be applicable for accident which took place after 01.04.2022 and not for the accident which had taken place earlier and in respect of persons in whom a right had already accrued and was available if the amendment had not been caused.

3.

Taking into these legal position into consideration, this Court is of the opinion that learned Trial Court erred in passing the impugned order. The same is quashed. Matter is remitted to the Fourth Member Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sagar (M.P.) to hear and decide the claim on its own merits.

4.

In above terms, appeal is disposed of.