High Courts(2011) 06 AHC CK 0052

Juber Ahmad vs State of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Home Deptt and Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 24 June 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shabihul Hasnain, J and Vedpal, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 243 words

Shabihul Hasnain and Vedpal, JJ.—This petition under Article226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 18.5.2011 lodged as Case Crime No.317/2011 under Sections147, 302, 201 IPC at Police StationGosainganj, DistrictSultanpur.

2.

Notice on behalf of opposite party No.s 1, 2 and 3 has been received by learned A.G.A. Notice against opposite party No.4 is dispensed with.

3.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records of the case.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that offence Sections147, 302, 201 IPC is not made out against the applicant as no specific role has been assigned to him and, as such, the impugned F.I.R. lodged against him is liable to be quashed.

5.

The petition has been opposed by learned A.G.A. by contending that the allegations prima facie disclose commission of cognizable offence and the the petition has no merit and is liable to be dismissed.

6.

We have considered the respective submissions made by the parties in the light of the averments made in the petition. The allegations in the F.I.R. prima facie disclose commission of cognizable offence. The truthfulness or falsity of the allegations made in the F.I.R. can not be looked into at this stage. The investigation is in progress. There appears no sufficient ground to interfere in the matter. No ground exists for quashing the F.I.R. The petition has no merit and is accordingly dismissed.