High CourtsDivision Bench(1921) 01 CAL CK 0019

Joy Narain Gole vs Mangobinda Bera

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 4 January 1921 · Citation: 64 Ind. Cas. 210

HON’BLE JUDGES
Teunon, J · Richardson, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 189 words
1.

This appeal arises out of a suit upon a mortgage bond. What was secured was 8 bishes of paddy. The Courts below held that the period of limitation applicable in such a case is six years. That view, in face of the Full Bench decision in Ram Chand Sur v. Iswar Chandra Giri 61 Ind. Cas. 539 : 32 C.L.J. 278 : 25 C.W.N. 57 (F.B.), cannot be supported. The period of limitation is 12 years as laid down in Article 132 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act. To decide other questions arising it might be found necessary to have a remand to the first Court. But the learned Vakil appearing for the appellant, rather than have the case remanded, prefers to accept the decree as made in the Court of first instance. To this also the learned Vakil appearing for the respondent consents.

2.

In the result the decree of the Additional District Judge is set aside and the decree of the Court of first instance is restored with full costs in this Court and in the Court of first appeal. Period of grace three months.