High CourtsSingle Bench(1911) 01 CAL CK 0031

Johan Smidt vs Ram Prasad

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 30 January 1911 · Citation: (1911) ILR (Cal) 425

HON’BLE JUDGES
Harington, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 113 words

Harington, J.—This rule must be discharged. Section 38 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act gives the Court power, inter alia, to order a new trial to be held. It has been argued by learned Counsel in support of the rule that the Court can only exercise the power u/s 38 if a question of law arises, but I find no such limitation in Section 38, and I think that the judgment in the case of Sassoon v. Hurry Das Bhukcut ILR (1896) 24 Cal. 455, shews that a new trial may be ordered where the judgment is manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

2.

The rule must he discharged with costs.