High CourtsDivision Bench(1886) 11 CAL CK 0004

Jogendra Nath Mukerji vs Jugobundhu Mukerji and Another by their Mother and Guardian, Nistarini Dabi and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 24 November 1886 · Citation: (1887) ILR (Cal) 122

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Comer Petheram, C.J · Beverley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 135 words

W. Comer Petheram, C.J.—Another question that arises is, whether a suit of this kind must be dismissed because it appears that the plaintiff has sought to partition only a portion of the joint property. It is a point upon which I should have thought there was room for doubt, but looking at the authorities I find that the authorities are in favour of such a suit being absolutely dismissed because it cannot be brought in that form, and therefore it seems to me we are bound to follow those authorities and to dismiss this appeal; but in dismissing it we make this addition that we reserve to the plaintiff liberty to bring a fresh suit for the partition of this property bringing in the whole of the family property. The appeal is dismissed with costs.