High CourtsDivision Bench(1918) 04 CAL CK 0020

Jogendra Nath Mitra vs Apara Prosad Mukerjee

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 11 April 1918 · Citation: 45 Ind. Cas. 616

HON’BLE JUDGES
Syed Shamsul Huda, J · Fletcher, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 172 words
1.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decision of the learned Subordinate Judge of Burdwan affirming the decision of the Munsif of the same place. The plaintiff, who is the landlord, sued for rent the defendant, who was a tenure holder under him. The only question in the appeal as it was in the Courts below is. Is the defendant liable to pay the cesses or did the landlord plaintiff undertake by the contract to bear that liability?" It is a perfectly clear case, because the property was let cut at Rs. 90 per annum including the cesses. The landlord might wisely or unwisely have agreed to that contract and it may be a misfortune that the cesses have been so considerably increased. ''But notwithstanding that the landlord clearly undertook by contract as between himself and the tenure-holder that he would bear the cesses. That being so, the view adopted by the learned Judge of the lower Appellate Court is correct. The appeal fails and is dismissed with costs.