Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2019) 02 SC CK 0451

Jigeesha Thakore vs Dilip Sumanlal Shah & Ors

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 19 February 2019 · Citation: (2019) 2 RCR(Civil) 886

HON’BLE JUDGES
Uday Umesh Lalit, J · Indu Malhotra, J
CASE NUMBER
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No(S). 23146 Of 2016, 18606 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 181 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners In SC Suit No.2713 of 2011, Notice of Motion No.2995 of 2011 was taken out by the plaintiff seeking interim injunction against the defendant-petitioner. The Bombay City Civil Court by its order 27.9.2013 granted the relief that was prayed for.

The order of interim injunction was confirmed by the High Court while dismissing Appeal from Order No.1240 of 2013 on 12.07.2016. In effect, the interim injunction has continued against the petitioner for last more than five years.

In the circumstances, we see no reason to interfere in the matter. The special leave petitions are dismissed. We, however, direct the City Civil Court at Bombay to dispose of the pending suit as expeditiously as possible.

Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

In view of the above, no separate orders are called for in the intervention application. Learned counsel for the intervenor prays for and is granted liberty to agitate the issues raised in the application in any properly instituted proceedings.

We shall not have expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.