High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 03 OHC CK 0033

Jhuna Karan vs Union Of India And Others

Orissa High Court · Decided on 7 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arindam Sinha, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4516 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 278 words

Arindam Sinha, J

1.

Mr. Tripathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, relief sought is for compensation on death of his client’s husband. The deceased was a registered worker under Odisha Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Board. He had identity card dated 19th August, 2014 issued to him. He died by lightening on 25th  November, 2014 while working on his land. Refusal to grant compensation was on the ground that he died within a period of one year from date of registration.

2.

Mr. Panda, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, the relaxation came by circular dated 27th January, 2015.

3.

Perused circular dated 27th January, 2015. The intention of State to forthwith pay compensation is evident from following extracted and reproduced below.

“I am directed to say that Government have been pleased to allow the OB & OCWWB to implement the enhanced scale of benefits hence forthwith in exercise of powers conferred under Rule 279 of the Odisha Building and Other Construction Workers (RE&CS) Rules, 2002 as mentioned below, without waiting for formal amendment to the rules.

xxx xxx xxx

Ø  The minimum period of registration of one year, required for availing assistance for purchase of safety equipment, working tools and death benefit (in case of natural death), is waived.”

4.

It appears, the deceased was doubly unfortunate. Not only he lost his life by lightening, the date of death preceded the relaxation by just under two months.

5.

In circumstances aforesaid Court cannot compel the State. Petitioner might once again approach the authority with his prayer for ex-gratia.

6.

The writ petition is disposed of.

………………………