High CourtsSingle Bench(2004) 04 JH CK 0108

Jharkhand Rajya Sichai Abhiyantran Samaiyak Karamchari Sangh vs The State of Jharkhand and Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 20 April 2004 · Citation: (2004) 3 JCR 178

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amareshswar Sahay, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 4424 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 257 words

Amareshwar Sahay, J.—Heard the parties.

2.

The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that though the Chief Engineer by issue of a letter dated 16.5.2002 as contained in Annexure-8 to the writ application requested the Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi to decide the claim of the members of the Petitioner Association regarding their absorption in their respective posts but no decision has yet been taken.

3.

In the counter-affidavit particularly in Paragraph 29 it has been admitted on behalf of the State that no decision has been taken by the Government as yet in the said matter. Nothing has been stated in the counter-affidavit as to why and for what reason, the Secretary, Water Resources Department is sitting tight and not taking any decision in the matter.

4.

In view of the above facts, this application is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within one week from today along with all supporting documents stating in detail about their claim to the Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner to the Secretary within the time specified, the Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi is directed to pass an appropriate reasoned order within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the representation in accordance with law considering the claim of the petitioner in its right perspective.

This writ petition is thus disposed of with the above directions.