High CourtsSingle Bench(1966) 09 GUJ CK 0015

Jethabhi Nanjibhai vs Bipinchandra Parshotam and Another

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 2 September 1966 · Citation: AIR 1968 Guj 183 : (1967) 8 GLR 640

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.B. Raju, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Application No. 179 of 1966

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 185 words
1.

This is an application u/s 561-A of the application contains a prayer that the charge framed under against the applicant should be quashed. The charge was framed u/s 406 of the India Penal Code. Even on the basis of the complaint, the applicant is the managing partner of the firm of the firm. The allegation in the complaint is in respect of a sum of Rs. 10,000/- which was realised during the business, of the firm. A charge of misappropriation cannot lie in respect of one firm of money received by a managing partner of partnership business, as what amount is due to various persons and what is due from them can be settled by taking accounts are taken, there cannot be a criminal complaint of misappropriation of a sum admittedly received during the partnership unless there is evidence to show that the amount of Rs. 10,000/- was specially entrusted to the applicant. There is no such allegation in the complaint that the sum of Rs. 10,000/- was specially entrusted. The charge framed is therefore, quashed and the proceedings are terminated.

2.

Petition allowed.