High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 12 MAD CK 0023

Jenith Aaron Immanuel vs Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 5 December 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Sivagnanam, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition (MD) No. 21503 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 457 words

V.Sivagnanam, J

1.

The petitioner/ A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.11.2023 for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w. 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, in Crime No.517 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that based on the secret information, the respondent officials were conducted raid on 11.11.2023 and at that time the they were seized 3.5 kgs of Ganja from A1 and other accused. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is college going student and he is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is in jail from 11.11.2023 and hence, he seeks bail.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the contraband recovered from A1 is commercial quantity. He would further submit that the petitioner is not having any previous case and the investigation of the case is pending.

5.

Considering the fact that there is no previous case pending against that the petitioner and that the contraband has not been recovered from the petitioner herein and also considering the period of incarceration and also taking into consideration of the principle stated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Sanjay Chandra and others vs. CBI reported in (2012)1 SCC 40 and the nature of the offence alleged by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai and on further conditions that:

(i) the petitioner shall affix his photograph and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar Card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity.

(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the trial Court on receipt of summons as directed by the trial Court;

(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

vi)If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.