High CourtsSingle Bench(2025) 01 MEG CK 1654

Jeniar G. Momin @ Angad vs State Of Meghalaya & Ors.

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 31 January 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Diengdoh, J
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail No. 2 Of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 387 words

W. Diengdoh, J

1.

Heard Mr. P.T. Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that an FIR was lodged by one S.I. Patrick S. Sangma, Incharge Rari OGC before the Officer-in-Charge, Bajengdoba Police Station on 24.11.2024. The allegations made therein pertains to seizure of alleged psychotropic substances from one of the vehicle involved in an accident on the same day i.e. 24.11.2024 at Snalgre, NH 51. On the said suspicious psychotropic substances being seized, three accused persons were arrested in connection thereof.

2.

It is also the submission of the learned counsel that, in course of investigation, the driver of the relevant vehicle had implicated the petitioner herein, who incidentally was one of the passengers of the said vehicle on the day the incident took place. He also submits that the petitioner is just a passenger of the said vehicle, and has no knowledge or connection with the said seizure made. In this regard, an application for grant of anticipatory bail was preferred before the Court of the learned Special Judge (NDPS), North Garo Hills District, Mendipathar, which eventually was rejected. Hence, this petition.

3.

The learned counsel has reiterated that the petitioner being innocent, and is not at all connected with whatever has transpired on the said date i.e. 24.11.2024, as such, anticipatory bail may be granted to him with any conditions that this Court may deem fit and proper to impose.

4.

Per contra, Mr. N. Syngkon, learned GA on behalf of the State respondents, has opposed the prayer made on the ground that investigation is ongoing, and it is reliably learnt that the involvement of the petitioner as far as the seizure of the said contraband substances has been confirmed. However, the learned GA has submitted that the report of the Investigating Officer as well as copy of the case diary may be allowed to be produced in this regard.

5.

On consideration of the submission made, the prosecution is directed to produce the latest status report as well as copy of the case diary on the next date fixed.

6.

In the meantime, as prayed for, the petitioner is allowed to go on interim bail on conditions that he shall not abscond, and that he shall cooperate with the Investigating Officer as and when required.

7.

List this matter on 13.02.2025.