High CourtsSingle Bench(1900) 08 CAL CK 0011

J.C. Stalkartt vs W. Stalkartt

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 17 August 1900 · Citation: (1901) ILR (Cal) 250

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stanley, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 139 words

Stanley, J.—This is not Chambers application.

2.

Mr. Edwards.--An application, which is not an original application, bu is only an application to supply the place of a retiring Receiver, may be mad in Chambers. The application is moreover consented to. Belchambers'' Practice, P. 99, citing Grote v. Bing 9 Hare 50 Blackborough v. Ravenhill 16 Jur. 1085.

3.

An application for the appointment of a Receiver on the retirement of another Receiver should be made in Court and not in Chambers.

Stanley, J.

4.

An application for the appointment of a Receiver in place of the retiring Receiver is not an application which should be made before the Judge sitting in Chambers, but should be in Court. I accordingly direct that this application be renewed in Court.

5.

The application was subsequently made by Counsel in Court and granted.