High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 01 KAR CK 0047

J.B. Gopinath @ Gopi Rao vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and K. Aravind

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 6 January 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Govindarajulu, J · K. Bhakthavatsala, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.F.A. No. 6201 of 2007 (MV)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 335 words
1.

Learned counsel for the appellant prays for enhancement of compensation. Learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 Insurance Company submits that the Tribunal has awarded adequate compensation and there is no good ground made out for enhancement of compensation

2.

Perused the LCR.

3.

The Tribunal has taken income of the claimant at Rs. 3,000/- and awarded compensation as under:

Pain and suffering

Rs. 30,000/-

Medical expenses

Rs. 21,000/-

Conveyance, nourishment and other Incidental expenses

Rs. 10,000/-

Loss of income during treatment period

Rs. 9,000/-

Loss of amenities in future life

Rs. 20,000/-

Disability

Rs. 20,000/-

Loss of amenities

Rs. 10,000/-

TOTAL

Rs. 1,00,000/-

4.

As per Ex. P2 Wound Certificate, the claimant sustained in all five injuries. Medical officer has opined that injury No. 5 is grievous in nature. He was treated in Chaitanya Hospital: He was subjected to CT Scan, brain and face. As per E-X.P9, findings of C.T. Scan of face, there is fracture of lateral and medial wall maxillary sinus with no significant displacement of fractured fragments; Lateral wall of right orbit shows fracture; right medial and lateral pterigoid plates show fracture,

5.

The claimant is a resident of Bangalore and a Tailor by profession. The accident occurred in the year 2006. His income is not proved. In our view, income can be safely fixed at Rs. 4,500/- per month. Loss of income during the period of treatment and rest for a period of three months comes to (4500 x 3) = Rs. 13,500/- as against Rs. 9,000/- awarded by the Tribunal and Rs. 10,000/-towards loss of amenities. Thus, the claimant is entitled for additional compensation of (Rs. 4,500 + 10,000) Rs. 14,500/-. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed holding additional compensation of Rs. 14,500/-along with costs end interest at the rate of 6% p.a, from the date of petition till its realisation. Respondent No. 1 - Insurance Company is directed to deposit the balance compensation along with costs and interest with the Tribunal within three months from today.