Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 05 ITAT CK 3524

Jaypeeco India Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 19 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member · Sanjay Awasthi, Accountant Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6676/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 338 words

PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Delhi-31 dated 07.08.2025 for the A.Y. 2012-13 in sustaining the exparte assessment made by the AO u/s.144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act.

2.

Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) passed exparte order and dismissed the appeal of the assessee by observing that no compliance was made by the assessee.

3.

Ld. Counsel also submitted that the AO made the addition and passed order u/s.144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act without considering the submissions made by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings. Ld. Counsel for the assessee, therefore, submitted that matter may be restored to the file of the AO to consider the submissions made by the assessee and complete the assessment afresh in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee.

4.

Heard rival contentions and perused the materials placed before us. On perusal of pages -32 and 33 of paper book, we observed that the assessee in the course of e-proceedings furnished its response to the notice issued by AO, including copy of ITR alongwith computation of income, copy of balance sheet and P & L account, copy of bank account alongwith narrations etc. None of these documents and response, furnished by the assessee were considered by the AO while completing the assessment nor the Ld. Ld. CIT(A) while passing the order, rather the Ld. CIT(A) observed that the assessee did not file any return nor furnished any details before the AO which is contrary to record.

5.

Thus, we feel it just and appropriate to restore the issue in appeal to the file of the AO. Accordingly, we restore this issue to the file of the AO with a direction to consider all the submissions, evidences furnished by the assessee and complete the assessment afresh and in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee.

6.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.