AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the 2nd respondent-insurer, perused the records.
Though the matter is listed for admission, with consent of both the parties, the same is heard for final disposal.
The injured-claimant has preferred this appeal, being not satisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded in the impugned judgment dated
09.02.2015, passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ramanagara, made in MVC No.422/2010, seeking enhancement of compensation.
The facts of the case are that on 14.08.2010 at about 9.00 a.m, when the injured-claimant was traveling in a bus bearing registration no KA-
51- 5498, the driver of the bus driven the same in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against KSRTC bus from behind. Due to the impact, the
claimant suffered grievous injuries and took treatment in the hospital by incurring 35,000/- for medicine.
After service of notice, the 1st respondentowner of the offending vehicle remained absent and placed exparte before the Tribunal. The insurer
did appear before the tribunal, filed written statement and contested the claim petition. During the enquiry before the tribunal, the claimant has
established the occurrence of the accident, actionable negligence on the part of the driver of the offending vehicle and its insurance coverage with
2nd respondent herein and the same has remain unchallenged either by the owner of the vehicle or by the insurer.
The Tribunal, after evaluation of the oral and documentary evidence has held that the accident had occurred due to rash and negligence of the
driver of the offending vehicle and consequently awarded global compensation of Rs.10,000/- with interest at 6% per annum from the date of
petition till the date of realization.
The learned counsel for the appellant vehemently submitted that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on the lower side and prays for
enhancement in the compensation.
Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the insurer submitted that the Tribunal, on appreciation of the evidence and material on record has
rightly determined the compensation payable to the claimant and awarded just and fair compensation, which does not calls for interference and
prays for dismissal of the appeal.
On careful evaluation of the material on record, it is seen that though the claimant has claimed that he has spent nearly Rs.35,000/- towards
medicine, no medical documents has been produced, in support of his claim. Wound certificate issued by the Doctor which has been marked as
Ex.P.2 reveals that the claimant-injured sustained the following injuries:
a) CLW 1cm x 1cm x muscle deep on inner aspect of upper lip and bleeding.
b) Right side 3 teeth is avulsed.
c) 1st teeth is broken at its half
The claimant-appellant has failed to produce any documents, as regards the period of treatment, medical bills. The doctor has opined that injuries
mentioned at ''b & c'' are grievous in nature and injure (a) is simple in nature and are fresh in nature. But, the claimant has not examined the doctor
to substantiate that he has sustained any permanent/functional disability, on the account of the injuries sustained by him. However, having regard to
the nature of injuries sustained by the claimant, this Court is of the considered view that though the Tribunal was justified in awarding global
compensation, the same is slightly on the lower side and interest of justice would be met if another sum of Rs.30,000/-, in addition to the
compensation awarded globally. At this stage, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent-insurer submits that the insurer had already deposited the
compensation awarded by the Tribunal, including the interest accrued therein. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part. In modification of the
impugned judgment and award dated 09.02.2015, passed by the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Ramanagara, in MVC. No.422/2010, the global
compensation payable to the claimant is enhanced from Rs.10,000/- to Rs.40,000/- (Rupees forty thousand only). The enhanced global
compensation would comes to Rs.30,000/-. However, it is made clear that the claimant-appellant shall not entitle for any interest on enhanced
compensation. The 2nd Respondent-insurer shall deposit the enhanced compensation without interest, before the Tribunal within four weeks from
the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment and on such deposit, the same shall be disbursed to the claimant, on proper identification.
There shall be no order as to the costs. Office to draw the decree accordingly.