High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 02 DEL CK 0443

Jatinder Chhabra vs Daya Prakash Gupta (Deceased) Thr Lrs

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 February 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 98 Of 2019, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 7555 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 338 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 18.09.2018, whereby the leave to defend application has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2.

Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of

the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, in respect of one shop in property bearing No. WZ-93, Titarpur, Tagore Garden, New Delhi, more particularly as

shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition.\3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the petitioner,

seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.

Petitioner who is present in Court in person, undertakes that he shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises

to the respondent on or before 31.03.2022. Petitioner further undertakes that he shall pay a sum of ₹7,000/- per month with effect from 01.04.2019 as

use and occupation charges to the respondent till the time he hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on

or before 31.03.2022.

5.

He further undertakes that he shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before the petitioner

vacates the premises on or before 31.03.2022. Petitioner further undertakes that the he shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the

tenanted premises or any part thereof.

6.

He further undertakes that the he shall not cause any damage to the property and shall hand over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted

premises to the respondent in a condition as existing today, subject to normal wear and tear.

7.

The undertaking is accepted.

8.

Learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the undertaking is acceptable to the respondent.

9.

The Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

10.

Subject to petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking, within two weeks in the above terms, execution of the impugned order dated 18.09.2018 shall

remain stayed till 31.03.2022.

11.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.