Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2024) 01 DRAT CK 0046

Jaswanti G. Badiani vs M/s Pegasus Assets Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 10 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Menon, Chairperson
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
M.A. No.593 Of 2016 (WoD) In Appeal No. 198 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 401 words

Ashok Menon, Chairperson

1.

The Appellants are in appeal impugning the order dated 30.12.2015 in Exhibit 17 in S.A. No. 86/2015 on the files of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Mumbai (D.R.T) whereby the Ld. Presiding Officer dismissed the application for amendment of the S.A. to incorporate a subsequent action taken u/s. 13(4) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. (“ the SARFAESI Act” for short) against the Appellants stating that the provisions of amending the plaint under the Civil Procedure Code do not apply to the proceedings under the SARFAESI Act and therefore it cannot be allowed.

2.

The Appellant contends that he is a senior citizen but has no vocation or means of livelihood and therefore seeks indulgence of this Tribunal by invoking the third proviso of u/s. 18(1) of the SARFAESI Act to keep the mandatory pre-deposit to a minimum of 25% of the amount demanded under the demand notice u/s. 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act.

3.

The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent bank has vehemently opposed this application stating that no indulgence has been shown that the Appellants is directed to deposit 50% of the amount and that the present dues are around ₹ 3 Crores. The Appellant has made out a prima facie case and has also to some extent that she is under financial strain.

4.

Under the circumstances the Appellant is directed to deposit a sum of ₹ 22 Lakhs as pre-deposit for entertaining this appeal. The said amount shall be paid in three instalments within a gap of two weeks each, as stated hereunder.

Numbers of Instalments

Payment on or before

1st Instalment ₹ 7,00,000/-

24.01.2024

2nd Instalment ₹ 7,00,000/-

07.02.2024

3rd Instalment ₹ 8,00,000/-

21.02.2024

5.

In default, the Appeal shall stand dismissed, without any further reference to this Tribunal.

6.

The amount shall be deposited in the form of a Demand Draft with the Registrar of this Tribunal.

7.

As and when the said amounts are deposited, they shall be invested in term deposits in the name of Registrar, DRAT, Mumbai, with any nationalised bank, initially for 13 months, and thereafter to be renewed periodically.

8.

With these observations, the I.A. is disposed of. The Respondent is at liberty to file a reply in the Appeal with an advance copy to the other side.

Post on 25.01.2024 for reporting compliance concerning the payment.