High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 09 P&H CK 0007

Jaspal Singla @ Jas vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 7 September 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. B. Chaudhari, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition Main No. 20670 OF 2018 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 485 words

This is second petition filed by the petitioner seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 0038 dated 02.04.2017 registered under Sections 22/61/85 of the

NDPS Act, at Police Station Tapa Mandi, District Barnala.

Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.

The petitioner was arrested in this case on 02.04.2017 and in jail since then. It is not in dispute that there is no other case pending against the petitioner

under the NDPS Act. It is also not in dispute that the decision made by the Apex Court on 16.08.2018 in the case of Mohan Lal Versus The State of

Punjab passed in Criminal Appeal No.1880 of 2011 would have application in the present case.

In that view of the matter, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, I make the following order:

ORDER

(i) The CRL. MISC. No.M-20670 OF 2018 is allowed.

(ii) The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail to the satisfaction of the concerned CJM/Duty Magistrate.

(iii) The petitioner shall give undertaking before the trial Court along with copy to the police station concerned, within a period of two weeks from the

date of his release, that he will not indulge in any/such type of offence in future.

(iv) The petitioner shall not tamper or influence the prosecution witnesses in any manner.

(v) The petitioner to surrender his passport with the trial Court, if he possesses the same.

Pursuant to order dated 31.08.2018, the States of Punjab and Haryana have tendered affidavits of: (i) Sh. Sarabjit Singh, PPS, Assistant Inspector

General of Police, Litigation, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab, Chandigarh dated 04.09.2018 (ii) Sh.Baljit Singh Sandhu, IPS, Director General of

Police, Haryana, Panchkula., respectively to show the compliance.

The gist of the order is to sensitize the police officers at the lowest level as to exactly what the officer should do and should not do in terms of decision

of Apex Court in the case of Mohan Lal (supra) passed by three Judges’ Bench by circulating them the exact directions. However, these

affidavits show that the officers are directed to follow the judgment of the Apex Court. It is very easy to ask them to read the Supreme Court’s

judgment. This is nothing but shirking of responsibility, insensitivity of the duty to the public and non-application of mind despite huge payment of

salaries.

This Court deprecates the attitude of the concerned and grants time to make proper compliance by the next date.

Mr. D. D. Sharma, Advocate for Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh has produced the office order dated 04.09.2018 which is taken on record. In

view of the high ranking officers working in the NCB, nothing further is required to be done.

Mr. J. S. Toor, Additional Public Prosecutor, Chandigarh prays for time to place on record the compliance report on affidavit.

In view of the above, the matter be posted on 28.09.2018 for compliance of order dated 31.08.2018.