High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 09 DEL CK 0064

Jasmer Kaur vs Jai Singh & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 September 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 851 Of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 278 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

The appellant was the claimant before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) in accident claim case (suit no.55A/09) instituted on

18.04.2009 on the averments that she had suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 03.01.2009 due to the negligent driving

of a truck bearing registration no.HP-12A-8635 by the first respondent, the said vehicle being registered in the name of the second respondent and

insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer).

2.

The Tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 12.08.2010, accepted the case for compensation holding the second respondent negligent. The

Tribunal awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.68,110/- in favour of the appellant and directed the third respondent to pay the same with

interest. The said amount includes Rs.14,210/- as medical expenses, Rs.1,200/- as attendant charges, Rs.2,700/- towards travelling expenses and

Rs.50,000/- towards pain and suffering.

3.

The present appeal was filed expressing grievance that the compensation awarded is inadequate.

4.

The appeal was put in the category of ‘regulars’ to be taken up on its own turn. Thereafter it was taken up in Lok Adalat on some dates in

an effort to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement but with no result. When it is taken up for hearing, there is no appearance on behalf of the

appellant.

5.

It is noted that the injury suffered by the appellant was fracture on the lower end of the hand. In the given facts and circumstances, the award of

compensation granted by the tribunal is found to be just and fair. There is no case made out for any enhancement.

6.

Thus, the appeal is dismissed.