High CourtsSingle Bench(1990) 12 AHC CK 0032

Jarawar Singh and Others vs The State

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 11 December 1990 · Citation: (1991) CriLJ 1806

HON’BLE JUDGES
G.D. Dube, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
C.A. No. 515 of 1979

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 351 words

G.D. Dube, J.—This appeal has arisen against the judgment and order of First Additional Sessions Judge. Bulandshahr, holding the appellants guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402, I.P.C. Along with these appellants one Man Singh was also convicted and sentenced of the offences Under Sections 399 and 402, I.P.C. He was also sentenced to one year''s R.I. u/s 25, Arms Act. It transpires that all the five accused were tried in respect of an offence allegedly committed between 31st July and Ist of August, 1974 in the Dharamshala. There were five sessions trials. The convicted accused Man Singh had preferred Criminal Appeal No. 543 of 1979. The remaining had preferred present Criminal Appeal No. 515 of 1979.

2.

It appears that Criminal Appeal No. 543 of 1979 was heard by Hon''ble O. P. Mehrotra, J. By his judgment dated 11-12-1986 Hon''ble Mehrotra, J. had allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence of appellant Man Singh, Hon''ble Mehrotra, J. had not believed the prosecution story and also held that the whole prosecution story was concocted. The evidence of the Police Officer produced by the prosecution was not at all believed. Consequently, Criminal Appeal No. 543 of 1979 had been allowed. The Office has reported that on account of error committed by an official of this Court, who has now retired, this appeal could not be connected with Criminal appeal No. 543 of 1979.

3.

Even though the list has been revised, none has appeared for the appellants. I have heard learned A.G.A.

4.

The principle of stare-decisis applies in this matter. The observations of Hon''ble O. P. Mehrotra, J. are binding in this case also. It is held that the fact regarding assembly of the appellants for the purposes of committing dacoity at the alleged date, time and place was not established.

5.

In the result, the appeal succeeds and is allowed. The judgment of the lower Court is set aside. The appellants are acquitted for charges leveled against them. They are on bail. They need not surrender. Their bail bonds are cancelled and sureties discharged.