High Courts(1881) 01 CAL CK 0003

Janokinath Gupta and The Empress vs Janokinath Gupta

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 27 January 1881

CASE NUMBER
Motion No. 9 of 1881

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 85 words

Mitter and Maclean, JJ.—The Petitioner, a constable, obtained a month�s leave, but failed to join his post at the expiration of that time. For this omission on his part he has been committed u/s 29, Act. V of 1861, and sentenced to two months'' rigorous imprisonment.

2.

We think the conviction is bad, because his failure to resume his duty on the expiration of the leave, does not, in our. opinion constitute an offence under the aforesaid section.

3.

The conviction is therefore set aside.