High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 09 MAD CK 0065

Jana vs State

Madras High Court · Decided on 14 September 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.D.Jagadish Chandira, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Original Petition No.22096 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 558 words

A.D.Jagadish Chandira, J

1.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 11.07.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 @ 147, 148, 294(b), 448 & 302 of IPC, in Crime No.520 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks bail.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused trespassed into the house of the victim and by assaulting him with iron rod had committed murder of the victim. Hence the complaint.

3.

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and since, he happens to be the friend of the main accused, he has been wrongly implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offence. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 11.07.2022 and he would also submit that the petitioner is prepared to comply with any stringent condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner along with the other accused due to wordy quarrel, entered into the house of the victim and by attacking him indiscriminately with iron rod, caused severe injuries all over his body and also in head and committed murder. He would also submit that the investigation has been completed and the final report has also been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram in P.R.C.No.30 of 2022. He would also submit that there is a previous case as against the petitioner and hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner and also taking note of the fact that the final report has also been filed , this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram, and on further conditions that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kancheepuram, at 10.30 a.m., everyday without fail, until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.