High CourtsSingle Bench(1911) 11 BOM CK 0022

Jamna Das vs Pandit Ram Autar Pande

Bombay High Court · Decided on 2 November 1911 · Citation: (1912) 14 BOMLR 1

HON’BLE JUDGES
Macnaghten, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 113 words

Macnaghten, J.—This is a perfectly plain case. The action is brought by a mortgagee to enforce against a purchaser of the mortgaged property an undertaking that he entered into with his vendor. The mortgagee has no right to avail himself of that. He was no party to the sale. The purchaser entered into no contract with him, and the purchaser is not personally bound to pay this mortgage debt. Therefore, he is not a person from whom, in the words of the 90th section of the Transfer of Property Act, u the balance is legally recoverable.

2.

Their Lordships will therefore humbly advise His Majesty that this appeal must be dismissed with costs.