High CourtsSingle Bench(1988) 12 DEL CK 0014

Jai Shree Sharma vs Inder Kumar Sharma

Delhi High Court · Decided on 7 December 1988 · Citation: (1988) 16 DRJ 288

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.N. Goswamy, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision Appeal No. 389 of 1988

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 359 words

N.N. Goswamy, J.

(1) ADMITTED. This petition by the wife is directed against the order dated 25-5-1988 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi whereby her application u/s 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act for maintenance pendants lite was disposed of and maintenance of Rs. 400.00 per month was allowed for the child. However, according to the directions, the maintenance was payable from the date of the order. The grievance of the petitioner is that the application u/s 24 was filed in 1986 and as such the maintenance should have been allowed from the date of the application and not from the date of the order.

(2) Notice of this petition was issued to the respondent. Counter affidavit has been filed, In the counter affidavit, it is stated that it was in fact the petitioner who had been delaying the proceedings both in the main petition as also in the application u/s 24 of the Act. Facts, in details, have been mentioned, which indicate that in spite of repeated opportunities the petitioner had not filed the salary certificate till January, 1988. Even otherwise, I find that the petitioner has been seeking adjournments and Therefore the petition could not be disposed of.

(3) The learned counsel for the respondent has very fairly agreed that the respondent will pay a sum of Rs. 5000.00 towards the period i.e., from the date of the application till the date of order in lumpsum and as such no further orders would be required. On consideration of the entire facts, I am of the opinion that this offer made by the learned counsel for the respondent is fair and will meet the ends of justice. Consequently, this petition is allowed to the extent that the respondent will pay a sum of Rs. 5000.00 towards the arrears till the date of the order and thereafter will pay maintenance in accordance with the order. The arrears would be paid within a period of one month from today. The revision petition is disposed of accordingly. No order as to costs.

(4) The learned trial Judge will proceedings and disposed of the main petition at an early date.