Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1988) 08 SC CK 0008

Jai Prakash Prasad and Others vs Rameshwar Prasad and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 18 August 1988 · Citation: (1989) PLJR 22

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.P. Thakkar, J · B.C. Ray, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3019 of 1988 (Arising out of Spl. Leave Petition No. 777 of 1986)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

Special leave granted. Heard both the sides. We are of the opinion that the High Court should have permitted the Appellant to urge the plea in the context of Section 4 (c) of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956. The High Court was not Justified in refusing the Appellant to urge the plea on the ground that it was urged at a late stage. We, therefore, direct the Might Court to permit the Appellant to raise this plea and dispose of the matter on merits. The objections that may be raised by the other side including the plea based on estoppel sought to be raised by the Respondents may be taken into account. We cannot and do not express any opinion as regards merits or demerits of such a plea. The High Court will afford a reasonable hearing to both the sides and dispose of the matter by a reasoned order. The appeal is allowed. The matter is remitted back to the High for being dealt with in accordance with law in the light of the observations made therein. There will be no order as to costs.