High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 P&H CK 3601

Jagpal Singh Maan & Ors. vs State Of Haryana & Anr.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vikram Aggarwal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No.56452 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 368 words

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL)

The prayer in this petition preferred under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘the BNSS’), is for quashing of FIR No.891 dated 11.10.2022, registered at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa, under Sections 337, 336 and 279 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise arrived at between the petitioners and respondent No.2 (Annexure P-3).

2.

The report dated 21.11.2025 received from the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sirsa, through the office of the District & Sessions Judge, Ambala, filed in the Registry, is taken on record.

3.

Vide order dated 16.10.2025, a Coordinate Bench had directed the parties to appear before the Area Magistrate/trial Court for getting their statements recorded with regard to the compromise (ibid).

4.

The Area Magistrate/trial Court was to submit a report in this regard in terms of the said order.

5.

Pursuant to the order dated 16.10.2025, the parties appeared before the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sirsa, and as per the report dated 21.11.2025 submitted to this Court, both parties got their respective statements recorded.

6.

A perusal of the aforesaid report would show that the parties have effected a genuine compromise without there being any pressure, coercion or undue influence. The powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the BNSS can be exercised in such like situations in order to prevent unnecessary vagaries of criminal trial to be faced by the parties, when there are remote chances of conviction of the accused. The compromise in question is found to be fully in consonance with the directions issued by the Apex Court in “Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543” and a Five Judges Bench of this Court in “Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052”.

7.

In view of the aforesaid report of the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sirsa, accompanied by statements of both the parties, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.891 dated 11.10.2022, registered at Police Station Sirsa City, District Sirsa, under Sections 337, 336 and 279 IPC, with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.