High CourtsDivision Bench(1901) 04 CAL CK 0004

Jagomohan Pal vs Ram Kumar Gope

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 16 April 1901 · Citation: (1901) ILR (Cal) 416

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rampini, J · Gupta, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 148 words
1.

The Magistrate's order should no doubt have set out the grounds on which he was satisfied that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace existed. Further, it would have been better, if he had given the 2nd party an opportunity of adducing his evidence.

2.

But the proceedings are under Chapter XII of the Code and are, therefore, not proceedings with regard to which the Judge had any powers of revision or reference.--Section 435 (3).

3.

We have no power to interfere except under the powers of "superintendence" conferred upon by Section 15 of 24 and 25 Vict., Clause 104.

4.

There is no provision in the law, which gives the Judge power to call for the record in such a case or to advise us, how we are to exercise our powers of superintendence. In the circumstances we are not disposed to interfere.