High CourtsDivision Bench(1918) 05 CAL CK 0030

Jagadish Narain Paramanik and Others vs Mahamuddin Mahamed and Others Represented by Their Guardian Grandmother Alakjadi Bewa and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 27 May 1918 · Citation: 46 Ind. Cas. 529

HON’BLE JUDGES
Syed Shamsul Huda, J · Fletcher, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 154 words
1.

This appeal must be dismissed. It is quite clear that the appellant in this case is not a representative of a party to the suit within the meaning of Section 47, Civil Procedure Code. That being so, unless he can bring the case under that section, there is no second appeal against the order of the learned Munsif. Even if the case came u/s 47 the order refusing to set aside the sale being appealable u/s 104(1)(i), is outside the definition of a decree and the order passed on appeal from such an order is final under Sub-section (2) of Section 104. The petitioner who claimed that he had got an interest paramount to the interest of the judgment-debtor, the interest of the judgment-debtor being altogether destroyed, could not ask the sale to be set aside under these circumstances. The present appeal, therefore, fails and must be dismissed will costs one gold mohur.