High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 KL CK 0317

Jafar Sadique vs Anil P.Varghese

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 22 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.Somarajan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition 240 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 229 words

P.Somarajan, J

1.

This Crl.R.P. is filed against the concurrent finding of conviction under Section 138 of the N.I.Act and the sentence awarded thereon.

2.

It is submitted that subsequently, the matter has been amicably settled in between the parties, the original complainant and the accused by making

payment of entire settled amount. But no application was submitted under Section 147 of the N.I.Act due to a mistake of fact. Subsequently, the

original complainant and his wife passed away. His children, the natural legal heirs were impleaded. They entered appearance through Counsel and

fairly submitted that they don't want to proceed with the conviction and the sentence awarded in view of the settlement arrived at by receiving the

entire amount due. Since the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act is a statutorily created o4ffence intended to give rigour to commercial

transactions and having regard to the submission, it is fit and proper to set aside the conviction and the sentence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act

against the revision petitioner.

This Revision Petition is allowed. The finding of guilt of accused under Section 138 of the N.I.Act and the conviction and the sentence thereunder are

hereby set aside. The amount deposited by the petitioner which comes to Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) shall be released to the petitioner

as it was not objected by the party respondents.