High CourtsSingle Bench(1922) 07 AHC CK 0007

J. Ovid vs Seth Chanda Bhan

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 5 July 1922 · Citation: AIR 1923 All 473 : 76 Ind. Cas. 650

HON’BLE JUDGES
Stuart, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 122 words

Stuart, J.—The Magistrate had certainly no jurisdiction to direct the lock to be broken and the property to be handed over to the third party as custodian, but, at the same time, I fail to see that either the Sessions Judge or the High Court has any jurisdiction, either, to interfere in the matter. The remedy of Ovid is clearly by a suit in the Civil Court. I do not consider it necesssary to make any remarks as to what the nature of this suit should be or who should be the defendant, but it is clear to my mind that any order I might pass in the matter will be absolutely without jurisdiction. I, therefore, direct the papers to be returned.