Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 05 NCLT CK 3166

J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. vs Stargaze Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.

National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 13 May 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Subrata Kumar Dash, Member (T) · Ashok Kumar Bhardwaj, Member (J)
CASE NUMBER
(IB)-173/ND/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

38 paragraphs · 1,641 words

ORAL ORDER

On 06.05.2024 we passed the following order:-

“Affidavit of service filed. There is no appearance on behalf of the Corporate Debtor, in the wake the proceedings qua it are set ex parte. List on 13.05.2024.”

2.

The particulars of transaction entered into between the parties are outlined in the synopsis filed along with the provisions, which reads thus:-

“At the request of the Corporate Debtor, YES Bank Limited (“Bank”) granted Credit Facilities to the Corporate Debtor in accordance with the terms and conditions as stipulated in facility letters, Term Loan Agreement and the transaction documents, in various tranches. The said credit facilities were inter alia secured by way of pledge of shares, hypothecation of movable assets, personal guarantee furnished by Mr. Shrikant Bhasi and Corporate Guarantee furnished by Asian Business Connections Private Limited and Carnival Films Private Limited.

That on 24.03.2022, the Government of India declared a nation-wide lockdown in view of the COVID — 19 pandemic. Pursuant thereto, the Reserve Bank of India announced COVID — 19 Regulatory package for a period of 3 months i.e. till 31.05.2020 wherein, inter alia regulatory measures were announced to mitigate the burden of debt servicing brought about by disruptions on account of COVID — 19 pandemic and to ensure the continuity of viable businesses vide Circular DOR.No.BP.BC.47/21.04.048/2019-20 dated 27.03.2020. The Corporate Debtor opted for moratorium in respect of credit facilities granted by the Financial Creditor to Stargaze Entertainment Pvt Ltd (“Borrower/Corporate Debtor”).

That since the situation of COVID — 19 pandemic did not improve after 3 months, the Reserve Bank of India extended the COVID — 19 Regulatory package for a period of 3 months i.e. with effect from 01.06.2020 till 31.08.2020 vide Circular DOR. N0. BP.BC.7l/21.04.048/2019-20.

During moratorium period i.e. for a period of 6 months, the accrued interest as on 02.09.2020 on the facilities granted by the Bank were provided as FITL i.e. Funded Interest Term Loan amounting to Rs. 2,61,06,819.47/- (Rupees Two Crore Sixty One Lakhs Six Thousand Eight Hundred Nineteen and Forty Seven Paise Only) which also formed part of the Credit Facilities as granted initially by the Bank. That as per the terms and conditions of the Facility Agreements, the Corporate Debtor was required to make repayments towards the facilities on the due dates, without any delay, demur or objections. However, the Corporate Debtor failed to make timely payments which was also in gross violation of the Facility Agreements.

That it is pertinent to mention herein that Corporate Debtor committed serious breaches and defaults in repayment of Principal amount and interest and other charges in respect of facilities availed by Corporate Debtor. Therefore, as on 29.12.23, an amount of Rs.70,33,51,777.91/-(Rupees Seventy Crore Thirty Three Lakh Fifty One Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy and Ninety One Paise only) is outstanding with respect to the facilities availed by the Corporate Debtor. The details of the outstanding are as under:

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

That the Bank vide a recall notice dated 12.07.2021 bearing reference number YBL/ARM/21-22/263 recalled the Credit Facilities granted to the Corporate Debtor. Thereafter, the Bank vide notices dated 26.07.2021 invoked the various Personal Guarantees and Corporate Guarantees which were given to secure the Credit Facilities of the Corporate Debtor.

Subsequently, vide Assignment Agreement dated 16.12.2022 executed by and between the Bank and J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstruction Private Limited (acting in its capacity as trustee of JCF YES Trust 2022-23/5) (“Financial Creditor”), the Bank assigned the Financial Assets/loans pertaining to the Corporate Debtor along with all rights, titles and interest in the financing documents and all underlying security created therefor, in favour of the Financial Creditor, i.e. the Applicant herein. As per the provisions of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the covenants of the Assignment Agreement, the Applicant is deemed to be the financial creditor of the Corporate Debtor and has become entitled to all the rights, titles, interests, claims and to initiate, continue, enforce, and/or defend all legal proceedings of any nature against the Corporate Debtor. It is pertinent to mention herein that till date of filing this Application the Corporate Debtor and the Guarantors have failed to make payment of the outstanding dues.

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, an amount of Rs.70,33,51,777.91 /- (Rupees Seventy Crore Thirty Three Lakh Fifty One Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy and Ninety One Paise only) constitutes a financial debt as on 29.12.23, and is liable to be paid by the Corporate Debtor, as on date of filing the present Application. Hence, the present Application under Section 7 of the I&B Code, 2016 is being filed for seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of Corporate Debtor i.e. M/s Stargaze Entertainment Private Limited.”

3.

As can be seen from Part-IV of the petition, the amount of debt defaulted to be paid by corporate debtor to the Petitioner is much above the threshold limit of Rs. 1 crore the Part-IV of the petition reads thus:-

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
4.

With the application filed by him, the Applicant has enclosed the report of NeSL (information utility). As can be seen from Form-D (the relevant excerpt of the record), the default committed by the corporate debtor was on 30.01.2021 Form-D (default report) from NeSL reads thus:-

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
5.

The present application was preferred on 27.01.2024, within three years from the debt of default.

6.

As can be seen from the provisions of Section 7 (3) of IBC, 2016, while considering admission of the application filed under Section 7, we need to satisfy ourselves as to whether the record of default recorded with the information utility is enclosed with the petition. The Section 7(3) reads thus:-

“7. Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor.—

…..

(3)

The financial creditor shall, along with the application furnish--

(a)

record of the default recorded with the information utility or such other record or evidence of default as may be specified;

(b)

the name of the resolution professional proposed to act as an interim resolution professional;

(c)

any other information as may be specified by the Board.”

7.

As has been provided in sub-section (5) of Section 7 of IBC, 2016, where this Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that a default has occurred and the application filed under Section 7(2) is complete and there is no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed Resolution Professional, it may admit the application.

8.

As can be seen from the NeSL report, the default in repayment of amount of debt has occurred. In M/s Innoventive Industries Ltd. vs. ICICI Bank & Anr. (Civil Appeal Nos. 8337-8338 of 2017) Hon’ble Supreme Court ruled that the NeSL report is conclusive proof of default. The relevant excerpt of the Judgment reads thus:-

“28.

…..The speed, within which the adjudicating authority is to ascertain the existence of a default from the records of the information utility or on the basis of evidence furnished by the financial creditor, is important.”

9.

The undertaking/declaration given by the RP that no disciplinary proceedings are pending against him is available at Page 37 and 38 of the paper book. From perusal of the written communication given by Mr. Ashok Kumar Gulla the IP, it is seen that there are no disciplinary proceedings pending against him with the Board of Institute of Cost Accountants of India. The communication from the RP reads thus:-

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment
10.

Despite notice served upon it, the CD chose not to appear before this Tribunal. Thus, in terms of the order dated 06.05.2024, the proceedings qua it were set ex-parte.

11.

In the wake, we are left with no option but to admit the present petition. Ordered accordingly.

12.

In the backdrop, moratorium as provided under Section 14 of IBC, 2016 is declared qua the CD and as a necessary consequence thereof the following prohibitions are imposed, which must be followed by all and sundry:

(a)

The institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the Respondent including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority;

(b)

Transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the Respondent any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial interest therein;

(c)

Any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the Respondent in respect of its property including any action under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002;

(d)

The recovery of any property by an owner or lessor, where such property is occupied by or in the possession of the Respondent.

13.

As proposed by the Petitioner, Mr. Ashok Kumar Gulla, having Registration No. IBBI/IPA-003/IP-N00024/2017-2018/10174 and E-mail id: [email protected], is appointed as IRP, subject to the condition that no disciplinary proceeding is pending against him and disclosures as required under IBBI Regulations, 2016 are made by him within a period of one week from this Order.

14.

It is further ordered that Mr. Ashok Kumar Gulla, having Registration No. IBBI/IPA-003/IP-N00024/2017-2018/10174, shall take charge of the CIRP of the Corporate Debtor with immediate effect and would take steps as mandated under the IBC specifically under Section 15, 17, 18, 20 and 21 of IBC, 2016 read with extend provisions of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution of Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016.”

15.

The Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- only with the IRP to meet the immediate expenses. The amount, however, will be subject to adjustment by the Committee of Creditors as accounted for by Interim Resolution Professional and shall be paid back to the Financial Creditor.

16.

A copy of this Order shall immediately be communicated by the Registry/Court Officer of this Tribunal to the Petitioner /Financial Creditor, the Respondent/Corporate Debtor and the IRP mentioned above.

17.

In addition, a copy of this Order shall also be forwarded by the Registry/Court Officer of this Tribunal to the IBBI for their records.