Supreme CourtFull Bench(2010) 11 SC CK 0002

ITO vs M. Pirai Choodi

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 19 November 2010 · Citation: (2011) 245 CTR 233 : (2011) 334 ITR 262

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H. Kapadia, C.J. · Swatanter Kumar, J · K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeals No''s. 9756 and 9757 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 199 words
1.

Heard learned Counsel on both sides.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

In this case, the High Court has set aside the order of assessment on the ground that no opportunity to cross-examine was granted, as sought by the Assessee. We are of the view that the High Court should not have set aside the entire assessment order. At the highest, the High Court should have directed the assessing officer to grant an opportunity to the Assessee to cross-examine the concerned witness. Be that as it may, we are of the view that, even on this particular aspect, the Assessee could have gone in appeal to the Commissioner of income tax (Appeals). The Assessee has failed to avail of the statutory remedy. In the circumstances, we are of the view that the High Court should not have quashed the assessment proceedings vide the impugned order.

4.

Consequently, the impugned order is set aside.

5.

Liberty is granted to the Assessee to move the Commissioner of income tax (Appeals). It is made clear that the Assessee herein will move the Commissioner of income tax (Appeals) within a period of six weeks from today.

6.

Accordingly, these civil appeals stand disposed of.