High CourtsDivision Bench(1897) 06 CAL CK 0009

Ishan Chunder Hazra and Others vs Rameswar Mondol and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 29 June 1897 · Citation: (1897) ILR (Cal) 831

HON’BLE JUDGES
O''Kinealy, J · Hill, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 153 words

O''Kinealy and Hill, JJ.—In this case the plaintiffs sued on the ground that they were reversioners goes on the death of one Brahmamayi Debi for the possession of land, in other (sic)feree for value in ejectment. The cause of action, namely, what the plaintiff''s were feror to, conv to prove in order to succeed, was that they were the reversioners concealed, ammamayi in regard to this property, and that the claim was not barred treated as a station. The defendants then could raise any answer they thought fit to though sectic of the claim; but the cause of action was one. Even in England, in an the option of in ejectment, all the parties in possession are joined. We think, therefore, and accepts tie decision of the Court below is wrong; and, setting it aside, we remand knowledge (sic)se to the lower Court for trial on its merits. Costs to abide the result.