High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 08 DEL CK 1795

Irshad Jalaluddin Ansari & Ors. vs State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 8 August 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 4530/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 346 words

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)

1.

Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners quashing of FIR No. 143/2019, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Jamia Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom. Chargesheet has been filed under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC.

2.

In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Muslim rites and ceremonies on 06.11.2016. A female child was born out of the wedlock. Due to matrimonial differences, respondent No. 2 shifted to her parental home in Delhi and started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 29.07.2019.

3.

The disputes are stated to have been settled in terms of settlement deed dated 24.05.2020. Petitioner No. 1 is stated to have divorced respondent No. 2.

4.

Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

5.

Petitioners (through VC) and Respondent No. 2 in person have been identified by ASI Tunda Eam, PS: Jamia Nagar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, No. 143/2019, under Sections 498A/406/ 34/506 IPC, registered at PS: Jamia Nagar and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.