High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 08 CAL CK 0007

Intiaz Ali @ Entaj And Ors vs State

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Samapti Chatterjee, J · Jay Sengupta, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Case (Bail Application) (CRM) No. 5342 Of 2020, Criminal Application No. 3656 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 177 words

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that there is a case and a counter case lodged by adverse parties. The only non-bailable

section is Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Besides, the First Information Report was lodged pursuant to an application under Section 156 (3) of

the Code which was filed after about 20 days of the alleged date of occurrence.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of allegations, we do not think that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required in this case. Accordingly, we are inclined

to allow this application for anticipatory bail.

In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Rupees Five Thousand only) each with one surety,

to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the condition that the petitioners shall meet the investigating officer once a week.

The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 5342 of 2020 and C.R.A.N. 3656 of 2020 are disposed of.