High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 02 DEL CK 0360

Institute Of Cellular Therapies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs Union Of India & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 13 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 8426 Of 2014, 4004 Of 2017, Civil Miscellaneous No. 19466 Of 2014, 18841 Of 2015, 17608 Of 2017, 5506, 5507 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 346 words

Rajiv Shakdher, J

1.

After some arguments, both Mr. Raju Ramachandran, learned senior counsel, who appears for the petitioners and Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, who

appears for respondents no.1 and 2, on instructions, submit that these writ petitions can be disposed of based on the following directions:

(i) The petitioners will file their application in Form No.44 as prescribed under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the extant rules and

regulations. The application so filed will be processed in accordance with law by respondent no.2 as expeditiously as possible.

(ii) Respondent no.2 will be entitled to verify as to whether there are patients on the rolls of the petitioners whose treatment commenced prior to

23.7.2014. The petitioners will give in this behalf full access to the records maintained by them and, if necessary, also allow the experts deputed by

respondent no. 2 to interview the patients as well.

(iii) In case it is found that petitioners have patients on their rolls, who have been receiving dendritic cell therapy, albeit, prior to 23.7.2014, their

treatment shall not be disrupted by respondent no.2.

(iii)(a) In case the decision taken by respondent no.2 on the petitioners’ application filed in Form 44 is against their interest, the treatment of

patients will not be disrupted for a period of four weeks. This period will commence from the date, when, the decision taken by respondent No. 2 is

communicated to the petitioners.

(iv) In case, petitioners are aggrieved by the decision taken on its application filed under Form 44, they will have liberty to approach this Court to

revive the instant petition within the period indicated in paragraph 1(iii)(a) above.

2.

To be noted, I am informed by Mr. Ramachandran that an additional affidavit dated 13.2.2014 has been filed in the Registry vide Diary no.44507.

2.1 The Registry will place the same on record. This affidavit will form part of the record.

2.2 A copy of the same has been served on the counsel for respondents.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petitions and pending applications are disposed of in the aforementioned terms.