High CourtsDivision Bench(2008) 02 BOM CK 0116

Indian Bank vs Baba Sakharam Kharbade and Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 13 February 2008 · Citation: (2008) 118 FLR 812 : (2009) 1 LLJ 559

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.C. Chavan, J · K.J. Rohee, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
LPA No. 333 of 2007 in Writ Petition No. 1788 of 2007

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 172 words
1.

Heard counsel for the parties.

2.

The appellant wanted to challenge the order of the Controlling Authority dated July 6, 2006 directing payment of gratuity to respondent No. 1. However, the appeal was preferred beyond 120 days from the date of order. Hence the appellate authority did not entertain the appeal. The learned single Judge held that the appellate authority had no jurisdiction to condone the delay in preferring the appeal beyond 120 days. In J.L. Morrison India Ltd. Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Asst. Commissioner of Labour, Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Government of Maharashtra, , the Division Bench of this Court held that the appellate authority under Gratuity Act cannot entertain appeal beyond 120 days from the date of receipt of the order and that resort to Section 5 of the Limitation Act is impermissible. In view of this clear position of law, we see no merit in the appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed.