High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 01 P&H CK 0152

Inderjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhir Mittal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 554 Of 2021 (O&M

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 329 words

Sudhir Mittal, JÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

The petitioner was posted as land acquisition Clerk in Fatehgarh Sahib at the relevant time. A complaint was made by a land-owner that compensation

to be paid to her was embezzled by him in collusion with other persons. For this purpose, the documents submitted by her were tampered with and an

account was opened in Bank of Maharashtra, where, the compensation was deposited instead of depositing the same in the account of the

complainant in Central Bank of India. Consequently, FIR No.97 dated 18.10.2019 has been registered against the petitioner, in which, investigation is

in progress. Meanwhile, a departmental enquiry has also been initiated. The petitioner has submitted a representation dated 3.12.2020 (Annexure P-

15) to the Commissioner, Patiala Division, requesting him to stay the departmental proceedings pending the conclusion of the criminal trial, by placing

reliance upon the law laid down by the Supreme Court of India. He has also prayed for transfer of departmental proceedings to a district other than

Fatehgarh Sahib as he alleges that the Inquiry Officer is biased.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is justified in contending that during the pendency of a criminal trial, departmental proceedings on the same set of

allegations should normally be stayed.

However, since a representation is pending before respondent No.3, I deem it appropriate in the first instance to direct him decide the same.

Notice of motion.

Mr. D.S. Sukarchakia, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and waives service.

In view of the nature of the order being passed, there is no necessity to seek a written statement.

The petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 to consider the pending representation dated 3.12.2020 (Annexure P-15) in accordance

with rules and law and to decide the same by passing a speaking order, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this

order. Till then, enquiry proceedings shall remain stayed.