AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
The present Appeal is preferred by the Income Tax Officer, Ward1(1), New Delhi under Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 on being
aggrieved by the action of the Registrar of Companies (“RoCâ€) in striking off the name of M/s APJ Textile Private Limited (“the Companyâ€)
from the Register of Companies.
It is stated by the Appellant that “the Company†is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the erstwhile Companies Act, 1956 on
19.12.2005 with CIN No. U17111DL2005PTC143831. The Authorised Share capital of the Company is Rs.10,00,000 and the Paid-up Share capital of
the Company is Rs.1,00,000. The registered Office of the Company is at Z-1, 129 Timber Market, Welcome Colony III, New Delhi, East Delhi-
110053. Therefore, the jurisdiction lies with this Tribunal.
The Appellant in its appeal has averred that:
“5.5 As the Respondent did not file its ITR and did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment, apparently, an
estimated amount of at least Rs. 30,60,000/- has escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147/148 of the IT Act and has not been
brought under tax for the A.Y. 2011-12.
5.6 Thus, the Appellant has reason to believe that undisclosed income as mentioned above has escaped assessment during A.Y. 2011-12,
because the Respondent did not disclose fully and truly all material facts to enable assessment, not filed its ITR, thereby rendering the
company liable for consequences under Income Tax Act, 1961 and entitling the Revenue to initiate proceedings against the company. Thus,
prima facie, there appears tax evasion which requires action in accordance with law….â€
It is submitted by the Appellant that it had issued a notice dated 30.03.2018 for the Assessment Year 2011-12 to the Company under Section
147/148 of the IT Act for assessment, re-assessement, or re-computation of income escaping assessment of tax.
It is stated by the Appellant that during the Assessment Year proceedings for A.Y 2011-12, the Appellant came to know that the Company has
been struck off from the Register of Companies by RoC at Sl. No 73 vide STK-7 Notice No.ROC-DEL-248(5)/STK-7/2879 dated 30.06.2017.
The Appellant contends that in order to frame the Assessment order and take appropriate and effective steps for recovery of taxes and for any
further consequential proceedings, there is a need of restoration of the Company, viz., M/s APJ Textile Private Limited in the Register of Companies.
That the Appellant has filed its Affidavit of Service dated 01.04.2019, wherein it is stated that the service of Notice on the Respondent Company
and its Directors/Respondents was effected through publication in the newspapers namely, Business Standard (English) and Jansatta (Hindi) on
29.03.2019. Considering the fact that the notice was served upon the Respondents and none was present, they were proceeded ex-parte vide order
dated 01.05.2019 of this Tribunal.
The Respondent No.1 i.e., ROC did not file reply despite opportunities. During the course of hearing on 01.02.2021, AROC submitted that ROC
has no objection to the revival of the Respondent Company.
It is observed that the Income Tax Department is an aggrieved party within the meaning of Section 252(1) read with 252(3) of the Companies Act,
2013 as it has to recover Income Tax/duties/cess payable by the Respondent Company and great prejudice will be caused to its revenues, if the name
of the Company is not restored back to the Register of the Companies.
Accordingly, in sequel to the above, we consider it to be just and equitable to allow restoration of the Company and allow the Appeal. The
Registrar of Companies, is directed to restore the name of the Company namely, M/s APJ Textile Private Limited. in its Register, as if the name of
the Company had not been struck off. ROC is also directed to take any other penal action against the other Respondents for default, if any, in
accordance with the statutory provisions.
The Appeal is allowed accordingly.
Let the copy of Order be supplied to the parties.
