Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2025) 11 ITAT CK 3880

Income Tax Officer, Ward-1 vs Yoginder Kumar & Sons (HUF)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 26 November 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6630/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 153 words

This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN & Order No : ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1077154764(1), dated 18.06.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset that the Revenue's instant appeal involves tax effect of Rs.11,51,171/- which is less than the minimum tax effect prescribed of Rs.60 lakhs in the CBDT latest Circular No. 9/2024, dated 17.09.2024.

4.

Learned Departmental Representative is indeed very fair in not disputing the fact that the CBDT's foregoing tax effect circular has been made applicable with retrospective effect on all pending appeals as well. I thus reject the Revenue's instant appeal for this precise reason subject to all just exceptions.

5.

This Revenue's appeal is dismissed in above terms.