Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2025) 12 ITAT CK 4728

Income Tax Officer vs Rambir

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 18 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manish Agarwal, Accountant Member · Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 4105/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 186 words

Per Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member:

This Revenue’s appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14, arise s against the CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1076085062(1) dated 07.05.2025, in proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

3.

Coming to the Revenue’s sole substantive ground seeking to revive the Assessing Officer ’s action making the assessee’s unexplained cash money addition or disallowance of Rs.1,02,00,000/- which has bee n delete d in the CIT(A)’s lower appellate discussion, we note that the necessary tax thereon comes to be less than the minimum tax effect prescribed of Rs.60 lakhs as per the CBDT latest Circular No. 9/2024, dated 17.09.2024.

4.

Learned Departmental Representative is indeed very fair in not disputing the fact that the CBDT's forego ing tax effect circular has been made applicable with retrospective effe ct on all pending appeals as well. We thus reject the Revenue's instant appeal for this precise reason subject to all just exceptions.

5.

This Revenue's appeal is dismissed in above terms.