Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3371

Income Tax Officer vs Ms. Rashmi Mehta

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 6 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.1238/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 161 words

This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s order dated 05.01.2026 passed in case no. NFAC/2013-14/10116523, involving proceedings u/s 147 r.w.s 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961; hereinafter referred to as the “Act”.

Heard both the parties. Case filed perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from both the parties that the total tax effect involved in the Revenue’s instant appeal file is Rs. 2,53,310/- i.e., less than the minimum tax effect prescribed of Rs.60 lakhs in the CBDT latest Circular No. 9/2024, dated 17.09.2024 with retrospective effect.

4.

Learned Departmental Representative is indeed very fair in not disputing the fact that the CBDT’s foregoing tax effect circular has been made applicable on all pending appeals as well. I thus reject the Revenue’s instant appeal for this precise reason alone subject to all just exceptions.

5.

This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.