Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 03 ITAT CK 2918

Income Tax Officer, Karnal, Haryana vs Sh. Robin

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 16 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.420/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 160 words

ORDER

This Revenue’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./JCIT (A)-9, Mumbai’s, DIN and order no. ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1083491331(1), dated 09.12.2025 involving proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2.

Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s/respondent’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.

3.

It emerges at the outset with the able assistance coming from the learned Departmental Representative that the total tax effect involved in this appeal file is Rs.1,27,261/- which is less than the minimum tax effect prescribed of Rs.60 lakhs in the CBDT latest Circular No. 9/2024, dated 17.09.2024 with retrospective effect.

4.

Learned Departmental Representative is indeed very fair in not disputing the fact that the CBDT’s foregoing tax effect circular has been made applicable on all pending appeals as well. We thus reject the Revenue’s instant appeal for this precise reason subject to all just exceptions.

5.

This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed.