High CourtsDivision Bench(1934) 01 MAD CK 0029

In Re: Yedama Subbaramiah

Madras High Court · Decided on 5 January 1934 · Citation: (1934) 39 LW 388 : (1934) 66 MLJ 408

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bardswell, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 127 words

Bardswell, J.—The conviction of the petitioner for offences punishable under Sections 225-B and 353, I.P.C. and the sentences therefor must be set aside. The warrant of arrest, the execution of which was resisted by the petitioner, is clearly an illegal one. The warrant of arrest was signed by the Deputy Nazir, an officer who had not been empowered legally or given any lawful authority to sign warrants, and the fact that it had been the practice for a considerable time for such warrants to be signed by the Deputy Nazir cannot make the signing of them by that officer legal in the absence of due authorisation. The petitioner who has been admitted to bail is acquitted and set at liberty and his bail bond will be discharged.