High CourtsSingle Bench(1891) 10 MAD CK 0004

In Re: Vittal Doss and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 October 1891 · Citation: (1892) ILR (Mad) 360

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shephard, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 190 words

Shephard, J.—I do not think that the language used in this will is such that Krisan Doss can be said to be constructively appointed executor.

My attention was called to the decision In the goods of Badhika Mohan Sett 7 B.L.R., 563 in which the words of the will being somewhat similar

the opinion was expressed that probate might be granted to the applicant as executor according to the tenor of the will. The case there mentioned

does not bear out the proposition for which it is cited. In that case there was a direction that the person named should collect the testator's estate

and pay all just debts, in other words, that he should discharge the function of executor. That therefore is a totally different case from the present.

On the other hand, when the testator left all his property and effects to his wife without giving any further directions, the Court held In the goods of

Thomas Henry Oliphant (1 Sw. & Tr., 525) in accordance with the practice, which had actually prevailed, that the wife was entitled to administer

with the will annexed and not to probate.