High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 02 MAD CK 0010

In Re: Tanguturu Sriramulu

Madras High Court · Decided on 16 February 1915 · Citation: AIR 1916 Mad 763(1) : 29 Ind. Cas. 29

HON’BLE JUDGES
John Edward Power Wallis, C.J · Trotter, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 137 words
1.

There is, we think, nothing in the allegation in paragraphs 7 and 8 of the affidavit. The plaintiff in the course of the case appears to have been

vaunting the merits of his paper and the District Judge in answer observed that he did not make much of it or him. Mr. Cotton in the observations

he has forwarded us very frankly admits that the observation, which was to some extent elicited by the observations of the plaintiff himself, who as

a litigant in person no doubt assumed considerable latitude, was injudicious and it was no doubt thoughtlessly made, but we do not think it and the

other allegations afford any serious ground for supposing that the plaintiff will not have a fair trial or for inducing him to think so.

2.

The application is dismissed.