High CourtsDivision Bench(2023) 08 MEG CK 0048

In Re Suo Motu Custodial Violence & Other Matters Relating To Prison Conditions vs State Of Meghalaya & Ors

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 21 August 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjib Banerjee, CJ · H.S. Thangkhiew, J
CASE NUMBER
Public Interest Litigation No. 9 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 301 words
1.

The matter was set down for conclusion today both on the number of cases where the State government would be required to pay compensation for unnatural deaths in custody, whether in jail or police lockup or otherwise; and, for determining the quantum of compensation.

2.

The State government has published a notification providing for Rs. 7.5 lakh as compensation in respect of unnatural deaths while in custody. There is a precedent in this Court where, in a judgment of the year 2018 in a case of torture while in custody resulting in death, a compensation of Rs. 15 lakh was awarded. The State appears to have accepted the order and made the payment.

3.

It is possible that a classification may also be made as to quantum based on the age of the person at the time of his death. It is also intended that the quantum of compensation for unnatural death in custody should be fixed at a punitive rate so that it is a real deterrent and it hurts the State government the next time that a citizen dies in its custody.

4.

Since previous notices were issued to the next of kin of the 50 persons who died in custody in the State since the year 2012, it will be open to the relatives of those who suffered custodial deaths to be represented in Court at the time of the next hearing.

5.

The matter will appear on August 28, 2023. The Registrar-General will issue a notice in the leading English and local language newspapers informing the general public that relatives of those who suffered custodial death in the State since 2012 may choose to be represented to be heard when the matter is taken up next. The cost of advertisements will be borne by the State.